WebMar 1, 2024 · The AO made additions towards long term capital gains derived from sale of shares and claimed as exempt u/s 10(38) of the Act, to the tune of Rs. 16.24 crores for the reason that the gains computed from sale of shares were unrealistic and the scrip was rigged in the market to derive undue benefit to the assessee. WebBOGUS Definition & Legal Meaning. Definition & Citations: ... The Law Dictionary is not a law firm, and this page does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If …
GST May Fair - WIRC-ICAI
WebOct 23, 2009 · Case laws on bogus purchases in favour of assessee Case law: 16 DTR 278 CIT V/s SINUJA FOODS P LTD (2008 (10) TMI 61 - HIGH COURT ... consumption or sale of goods suspected, revenue therefrom credited in P & l a/c ec. External and third party evidences like transporters note, insurance policy cover, etc. ill be highly useful. A party … Web•Similar provision in VAT law - On Quest Merchandising India Pvt.Ltd. Vs.Commissioner of Trade – Delhi(2024) HC struck down a similar provision under Delhi VAT Act as violative of Article 14 . SLP dismissed with rider that it can be used in case only in Fraud cases. – •Bombay HC decision in case of Mahalaxmi Cotton Ginning Pressing and Oil first indian woman olympic medal winner
bogus+purchase Indian Case Law Law CaseMine
WebDev Milk Foods Pvt. Ltd vs. Addl CIT (ITAT Delhi) S. 143 (3)/ 292BB: Under CBDT Instruction No.5/2016, a case earmarked for 'Limited Scrutiny' cannot be taken for 'Complete Scrutiny' unless the AO forms a "reasonable view" that there is a possibility of under assessment of income. The objective of the instruction is to (i) prevent fishing and ... WebThe SC referred to the decisions of the SC in the case of Kale Khan Mohammad Hanif V CIT1, Sumati Dayal Vs. CIT2, ... are bogus entries of name lenders.; If the enquiries and investigations reveal that the identity of the creditors appears to be dubious or doubtful, or lack creditworthiness, then the genuineness of the transaction could not be ... WebJun 15, 2024 · The addition was sustained by the ITAT 8% of the bogus purchases. On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Ld.CIT(A) has passed a reasonable order. He has correctly deleted the penalty with reference to bogus purchase addition at Rs.3,83,388/-, as the addition was done on an estimated basis. first indian woman physician